ABSTRACT
Background: The national program for prevention and control of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke (NPCDCS) has been rolled out in West Bengal, with its implementation initiated through state-wide training of Medical Officers (M.O). For attaining requisite competency for meeting NPCDCS objectives, MOs have been trained at their respective district levels. Present study aimed to assess the training need, training efficacy and need for further training.Methods: A repeat cross-sectional study was conducted from May-July 2018 for M.Os of six randomly chosen districts of West Bengal, out of those whereat NPCDCS was launched in first phase. 40-45 M.Os were randomly selected from each district in liaison with district level health authorities. The total sample size was 352 with Finite population correction. On the days of training, pre and post training surveys were conducted with an identical semi-structured, pre-tested and validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8) covering different levels of cognitive domain, with a maximum possible score of 100 marks. No negative marking was done for incorrect responses. Training was imparted by the Principal Investigator (accredited trainer). Ethical clearance was granted by the State Health Directorate. Informed consent from each participant was obtained.Results: Dependent sample t-test revealed significant increment (p<0.0001) in post-test scores (t=63.134) & one-way repeated measure general linear model (GLM) also revealed F=29.617 (p<.0001). The “Effect Size” was classified as “Huge” (Cohen’s D=63.134/√(352)= 3.365), as was noted between pre-test and post-test scores, based on Cohen’s convention and Sawilowsky’s addition. It was further noted that even after six hour training sessions there was 27.44% knowledge gap (p<0.0001) after adjusting for Bonferroni.Conclusions: Imperativeness of training coupled with periodic refresher training has been established as a pre-requisite for successful implementation of NPCDCS.
ABSTRACT
Integrated management of neonatal and childhood illness (IMNCI) was already operational in many states of India, but there were very few studies in Indian scenario comparing its validity and reliability with the decisions of pediatricians. The general objective of the study is to compare the IMNCI decisions with the decisions of pediatricians and the specific objectives are to assess the agreement between IMNCI decisions and the decisions of pediatricians, to assess the under diagnosis and over diagnosis in IMNCI algorithm in comparison to the decisions of pediatricians and to assess the significance of multiple presenting symptoms in IMNCI algorithm. The study was conducted among the sick young infants presenting in pediatric department from January to March 2009. The IMNCI decision was compared with pediatrician's decisions by percent agreement, Kappa and weighted Kappa with the aids of SPSS version 10. The overall diagnostic agreement between IMNCI algorithm and pediatrician's decisions was 55.56%, (Kappa 0.32 and weighted Kappa 0.41) with 33.33% over diagnosis, and 11.11% under diagnosis. 71.88% young infants with multiple symptoms and 40% with single symptom were classified as red by IMNCI algorithm, which is statistically significant (P=0.004) whereas 56.25% young infants with multiple and 31.76% with single symptom were considered admissible by pediatricians, which is not statistically significant (P=0.052).
ABSTRACT
A hospital based cross sectional study for one year done among 57 diagnosed and admitted septic abortion cases, revealed that 71.9% septic abortions were performed by untrained persons, 63.2% mothers were illiterate, 22.8% mothers were in adolescent age group. Exploratory Laparotomy was needed in 46.3% cases and important complications for referring were severe anaemia and septic shock.